BreakTheSilenceAboutSouthAfrica

. .......𝐓𝐎 𝐑𝐄𝐀𝐃 𝐄𝐀𝐒𝐈𝐋𝐘 𝐎𝐍 𝐀 𝐒𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐓 𝐏𝐇𝐎𝐍𝐄, 𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐊 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝐓𝐇𝐑𝐄𝐄-𝐃𝐎𝐓 𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐔 & 𝐂𝐇𝐎𝐎𝐒𝐄 𝐈𝐍𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐕𝐈𝐄𝐖.

....OM MAKLIKER TE LEES KLIK ASSEBLIEF OP DIE VERSTELLING REGS BO EN KIES 'INSTANT VIEW'.

YOU CAN INITIATE AUTOMATED VOICE READING OF ANY OF MY WIKI PAGE ARTICLES AND THEN DO OTHER THINGS.

YOU MUST JUST, IN NORMAL VIEW, HIGHLIGHT A PIECE OF TEXT THEN IN THE RESULTANT MENU... CHOSE "READ ALOUD".

I am Les Cass (Leslie John)...

Initiator of the very successful CutCrime Project in 1996, then inventor/patentor of the Hand-Held Parking Meter to also reduce crime that was also very successful but abandoned in 2020 because we could just not carry on with municipalities that are useless also with officials that just continue to lie to us and do not do any of the things that they get paid to do.....we had built up 27 in 20 years due to absolutely ZERO ASSISTANCE FROM THE SOUTH AFRICA OFFICIAL STRUCTURES and the issues as explained above...

SO IN 2022 we started the SE project that requires no participation from municipalities or the South African Police Service...

NOW WE ARE MAKING PROGRESS....LOOK at bit.ly/whereIsStreetEyes.

SOME MORE OF THE TRUTH....and...

Time for a laugh, a history lesson, and a bit of DID YOU KNOW??

If apartheid was SO merciless and inhumane, how did Mandela manage to get a law degree?

   • Was it inhumane for whites to have built TEN Universities for blacks during Apartheid?
   • Didn't this inhumane Government increase its budget on black education by 30% every year? 
   • Paid for by white taxes.
   • How was it possible in such inhumane conditions, for 65% of black South African children to be at school, compared to Egypt 64%, Nigeria 57%, Ghana52%, Tanzania50% and Ethiopia 29%?
   •  How was it possible in such inhumane conditions, that 71% of black adults in South Africa could read and write, compared to Kenya 47%, Egypt 38%, Nigeria 34% and Mozambique 26%?
   •  Didn't these 'inhumane racist whites' build 15 new classrooms for black schools, EVERY working day, EVERY year?
   •  How was it possible in such inhumane conditions, for the black population to grow from 5 million to 40 million?
   • If the Apartheid regime was so inhumane, why did it spend 56% of its annual budget on blacks?
   • If it was so inhumane, how was it possible for black living standards to rise by 5.4% per year?
   • If it was so inhumane, how did Soweto get 115 football fields, 3 rugby fields, 4 athletic tracks, 11 cricket pitched, 2 golf courses, 47 tennis courts, 7 swimming pools built to Olympic standards, 5 bowling alleys, 81 netball fields, 39 children's play parks, and 78 civic halls, 42 cinemas, 48 clubhouses, 316 churches, 378 schools, 2 technical colleges, 8 clinics, 63 child day care centers, 11 Post Offices, and its own fruit and vegetable market? 
   •  All paid for by white taxes! 
   • If it was SO bad, why did Soweto alone have more cars, taxis, schools, churches and sport facilities than most independent countries in Africa? 
   •  more private vehicles than the entire white population of the USSR at the time?
   •  Who gave Blacks the Baragwanath Hospital for free? The biggest hospital in the world, with 3245 beds and at its peak almost 8200 staff? 
   •  It had 23 operation theaters fitted out with the most modern medical equipment that existed in the world; where Blacks were treated and operated on, at full government subsidies, costs to the white taxpayers for unlimited periods. 
   •  The budget of this hospital was higher than the yearly budget of most small member states of the United Nations. 
   • It employed 456 medical doctors in full-time service. 
   •  It treated 112 000 in-patients and 1.76 million out-patients per year. 
   •  The children and infant death rate with 34.8 per 1000 was lower than Harlem in New York. 
   •  In 1982 alone, this hospital performed 908 heart operations of world standard on Black patients. 
   • 94% of the blood donors to that hospital, whites? 
   •  Who gave the blacks the St. John's Eye Clinic, world famous for the treatment of Glaucoma, cataracts, eye traumatic injuries and rare tropical diseases? 
   • All built and maintained by white taxpayers money for blacks. 
   •  And remember that 92% of the inhumane whites voted for change in South Africa in the referendum of 17 March 1992. 
     

But hey; let's keep on blaming the whites and apartheid 30 years after an entire country, in perfect working condition, was handed over to Black majority rule.....and this anc is still blaming apartheid 30 years later ...IT MUST BE A JOKE..

.....#BreakTheSilenceAboutSouthAfrica

This that a greatGreatGREAT-GR8 FRIEND OF MINE SPARKED THIS....

Bit.ly/BreakTheSilenceAboutSouthAfrica

AFTER YEARS OF CALLED CONSPIRACY,

WE WILL SOON THE FACE REALITY.

Ever wondered what happened to South Africa?

This is the open deception channel of funds into western nations and SA to destabilize from within.

https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/what-we-do/themes/human-rights-movements-and-institutions

Are there military planned terrorist attacks against South African farmers or is the mod-us operand similar just by chance?

Is the godlessness now so prevalent across South Africa just by chance?

Is the total breakdown and perversion of the South Africa judiciary just by chance?

Is the horrific crimes against all civilized people in South Africa just by chance?

Is the mass unrest at times just by chance?

Is the availability of hard drugs destroying the South African youngsters just by chance?

Does anyone ever see this info i share, because on one EVER comments.

HAS HUMANITY BECOME SHEEP OR IS THIS STUFF BEING BLOCKED?

EITHER WAY WE IN TROUBLE.

Follow the narrative along with the money. This link is a look at the liberals attack on the USA today and South Africa's history into a failed communist state.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter

DO WE NOW ALL SHOUT CONSPIRACY AGAIN AND WALK AWAY FEELING GOOD.

GO TO TOWN ANYWAY IN THE WORLD AND LOOK AROUND, HOW NORMAL IS EVERYTHING AROUNDYOU, OR IS THIS JUST AN ACCEPTABLE NEW NORMAL.

HERE ARE SOME FACT FROM A MAN'S STUDIES.

I SPEAK ON BEHALF of a sizeable portion of South Africa who would once and for all like to know exactly which whites stole which pieces of land and from which blacks.

The message that goes out from the presumptious EFF and thus indirectly from the ANC is that all land was stolen from all blacks by all whites... Not only does Juliass malema makes such false statements, but many others too who support him, so this is a serious issue which requires serious clarity.

Let’s look at one small example. In 1834 the king of the Pondos, King Faku, gave the land between the Mbashe and Mkomazi rivers to the Dutch settlers on the condition that they go and live there. He wanted them as a buffer between him and Dingane who constantly stole his cattle and tried to chase him off his land. Another agreement was in February 1838, when Dingane himself signed a treaty allowing Piet Retief and his group of approximately 100 Voortrekkers to occupy the land between the Tegula River and Port St. John's.. (a copy of this agreement can still be found today). In 1825, when Shaka met the British for the first time, he allowed the British to take control of what was then called Port Natal, and, in return for this gesture, 2 British commanders, known as Fynn and Farewell, presented Shaka with beads, brass, blankets made of cloth, and other small inventions that could have very easily been brought over by ship. These are just a few examples of some land that whites legally, or by mutual agreement, acquired from blacks. These stretches of land, and the farms on this land today, certainly cannot be defined as stolen... Our history is littered with such barters and gifts, where land was traded for cattle or in many cases given as a reward for returning lost or stolen cattle from a neighbouring tribe to its original tribe. As for King Faku, the question is whether the land was Faku’s to give in the first place. He, or his predecessor, undoubtedly took it by force from another hapless black tribe... Stealing, you may call it. Of course Dingaan also tried to get his hands on it. He, and particularly Shaka before him, “stole” massive pieces of land; in fact they chased the Matabele people off their land, all the way to Zimbabwe where they still live. The Matabele may argue that a large part of South Africa rightfully belongs to them and that the current black inhabitants should depart.

Needless to say that, even before the black tribes started “stealing” land from each other, the San people lived here. They have the strongest claim of all. To add a twist, by studying old documents and reading old diaries, you discover that vast areas of land were uninhabited when the Dutch arrived, basically no-man’s land. These areas got occupied and vacated almost at random, as a result of regional wars (or exterminations by other tribes) that took place from time to time. The only difference between the Dutch who settled there and the previous occupants, who were gone, was that the Dutch were able to defend their positions and were not driven away. I’m not sure how to bring this letter to the attention of juliass mal malema and those who think like him. It is a very serious issue, since the disregard of treaties, no matter how old, tends to de-stabilize whole regions. We need clarity about the grounds on which juju mal malema's own claims are based... If he is not interested in historic fact or the historic treaties that his forefathers entered into (not to mention those made by the ANC with the NP in 1994), and if he simply wants to seize land belonging to whites, then he is of course, planning to cause unrest, , #RaceagainstRace ....To My Critic's it's Not a White Thing, It's The Right Thing..

Please follow my next post THE KILLING OF THE WHITE WOLF (E.T)

THE FULL HISTORY VIDEO IS A MUST TO NOTE.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4QcaHasPOWGU/

The Untold Story by Anand Chetty 061 886 7175

YOUR ASSISTANCE TO FURTHER DEVELOP THESE FACTS IN THIS IS WELCOMED.

Just send posts to me Bit.ly/CassConInfo

CABAL IS LOOSING SOUTH AFRICA.

A well summarised and insightful assessment of the SA situation.

South Africa’s Free Ride on the Global Stage Is Ending.

For three decades, South Africa has been treated as a political anomaly—a state where governance failures have been dismissed as unfortunate by-products of history rather than recognised as the direct consequences of policy choices. It has been shielded from scrutiny by a global political order that remains too ideologically invested in the country’s post-apartheid narrative to hold it accountable for its own decline.

The ruling African National Congress (ANC) has governed as though political power is a permanent right, not a responsibility, convinced that its struggle credentials give it immunity from judgement.

But as its corruption, mismanagement, and ideological radicalism continue to unravel the country, the illusion that South Africa is a stable democracy is beginning to collapse.

Donald Trump’s recent comments on Monday, 17 March 2025, about South Africa being a place “where the Human Rights of people has been strenuously questioned”, and on a so-called watchlist, are not simply rhetorical jabs or passing provocations.

While not a formal watchlist designation per se, they signal that South Africa is now under heightened scrutiny in Washington, especially after the 7 February 2025 executive order issued by Trump, entitled Addressing Egregious Actions of The Republic of South Africa.

This marks a shift from how the country has been treated by previous US administrations, where it was largely overlooked, indulged, or seen as too inconsequential to warrant serious attention.

The ANC, always quick to react with outrage to any Western critique, has so far remained silent.

But its lack of response is not a sign of indifference—it is a sign that the party does not know how to respond when its usual defences are starting to lose their effectiveness.

South Africa’s leadership will undoubtedly attempt to frame this as an attack by a right-wing American president who does not understand the country’s complexities.

It will claim that Trump is targeting South Africa because of its independent foreign policy, its membership in BRICS, and its opposition to Israel.

It will cast itself as the victim of an imperialist smear campaign, relying on the well-worn language of anti-colonial resistance.

But these reflexive accusations will ring hollow because Trump’s words are not about foreign policy or ideological positioning—they are about something much simpler: the fact that South Africa has become a country whose decline can no longer be ignored.

For too long, South Africa has been allowed to deteriorate without consequence. It has presided over one of the highest crime rates in the world, a collapsing state infrastructure, and an economic crisis that has left more than 40% of its workforce unemployed.

It has done so while still expecting the world to treat it as a moral authority, a champion of human rights, and a legitimate voice in global affairs.

The reality is that South Africa today is a failing state, one that has been held to a different standard than other countries in comparable conditions. But the era of treating the ANC as a party above reproach is coming to an end.

South Africa’s Free Ride on the Global Stage Is Ending.

For years, South Africa has been a paradox in international politics: a country that aligns itself with authoritarian regimes while still expecting preferential trade agreements from Western democracies, a government that speaks in the language of equality while presiding over one of the most unequal societies in the world, a state that condemns “imperialism” while benefiting from Western economic partnerships.

This contradiction has persisted because the world has allowed it to persist, unwilling to challenge South Africa’s status as a supposed democratic success story.

Western governments, international organisations, and global media have all played a role in sustaining the illusion that South Africa is a model, albeit with some flaws, for post-colonial governance.

It has been treated with diplomatic leniency, granted leadership roles in institutions like the United Nations and the G20, and given economic benefits that other struggling nations do not receive. They even gave a criminal Jackie Selebi the post of commissioner of Interpol. What an abject disaster but that was brushed aside quietly once he was convicted and sentenced to incarceration.

The ANC has counted on this, believing that it can continue to pursue radical policies at home while still enjoying the goodwill of the international community. But that goodwill is evaporating.

Trump’s comments signal a shift in the global narrative surrounding South Africa. The country is no longer being viewed as an emerging democracy with growing pains but as a nation that is actively imploding due to the reckless governance of its ruling party.

This shift is not just coming from the US; it is emerging in diplomatic circles worldwide, where there is increasing frustration with South Africa’s unreliability as a global partner.

Countries that once regarded South Africa as a valuable ally in diplomacy and trade are now questioning its reliability as a stable partner.

Why Washington Is Finally Paying Attention The ANC has long counted on global indifference to maintain its hold on power, leveraging historical grievances and ideological rhetoric to shield itself from criticism.

But that era is coming to an end. The recent expulsion of South Africa’s ambassador to the United States, Ebrahim Rasool, underscores a growing recognition in Washington that South Africa is no longer just a poorly governed nation—it is an ideological player advancing an agenda that is increasingly at odds with Western interests.

Rasool’s remarks accusing Trump of leading a “global white supremacist movement” were not an unfortunate slip—they were emblematic of the ANC’s broader strategy of deflecting from its failures by resorting to radical rhetoric.

Rasool’s expulsion is just one piece of a larger puzzle. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has long been vocal about the dangers of leftist governments, particularly those that prioritise ideological narratives over functional governance.

Rubio’s refusal to attend the G20 ministerial summit, citing South Africa’s radical leftist policies, was a strong indication that Washington’s view of Pretoria is shifting. South Africa’s selection of “Solidarity, Equality, and Sustainability” as the theme for its G20 presidency was interpreted as further evidence of the ANC’s obsession with ideological posturing at the expense of economic realities.

A Government That Has Never Been Held Accountable for Its Own Failures The ANC’s governing strategy has been singular: deflect whenever confronted with failure. It does not answer for why Eskom, the state electricity provider, has collapsed under corruption and mismanagement.

It does not explain why its economic policies have driven businesses out of the country and left millions jobless. It does not take responsibility for the fact that its transformation policies have only enriched a small political elite while doing nothing to alleviate poverty.

Instead, it blames apartheid. It blames colonialism. It blames capitalism, Western interference, and, when convenient, it's the white South Africans.

The consequences of this impunity have now caught up with the country. The infrastructure is decaying. Lawlessness has taken hold in vast parts of South Africa.

The economy is shrinking. Unemployment is at record highs, and the government’s only response is to double down on failed policies rather than reconsider its approach.

The failures of ANC governance are not accidental. They are the direct consequence of a system that prioritises political loyalty over competence, ideological purity over practical governance, and racial narratives over real economic solutions.

This approach has led to a failing economy, a collapsing state infrastructure, and a deep-seated culture of entitlement and impunity within the ruling elite.

The Final Verdict South Africa is being watched. Not because of its history, not because of ideological disagreements, but because of its present reality. The world is no longer willing to ignore the consequences of the ANC’s governance.

Whether South Africa acknowledges this and makes meaningful changes remains to be seen. But what is clear is that its era of unquestioned global goodwill has ended.

The world is shifting, and South Africa must decide whether it will continue down the path of economic and political ruin or take accountability for its failures.

The ANC’s governance has become indefensible. The longer it clings to ideological deflections rather than real solutions, the more isolated South Africa will become.

The scrutiny South Africa faces today is not foreign interference—it is long-overdue accountability.

YOUR ASSISTANCE TO FURTHER DEVELOP THESE FACTS IN THIS IS WELCOMED.

Just send posts to me Bit.ly/CassConInfo

.